Видео

9:45

Super helpful, thank you!

Excellent presentation, but for those interested in more specific detail with securities particularly: 14:13 CORRECTION: rather, it’s a good point, however, I think it’s simplified for time, but I’d like to note: Underwriters may or may not be taking the risk. The analogy of Amazon vs Walmart in BOTH cases they are underwriters. Underwriters can be on a “Best-Effort” Underwriters in which they make their best effort to sell the shares or debt securities but have no duty to purchase the rest, nor do they ever even take possession. There can be “best effort” underwriters who sell on a “All or None” in which the hold the shares in escrow but do not have a title or ownership, and when either the cash pile is full and the shares are gone and the cash goes to the issuer, OR A MINI-max in which when the cash is just enough, or the number of shares misses the minimum number the issuer wanted sold, they will transfer the shares and cash to the investor or issuer appropriately. There are underwriters who promise to buy… But in Securities, they are all still underwriters, so when you look to buy an IPO or APO… you should ask what kind of underwriting they are using. Or… since this is for business folks. When you go public, what is the ideal kind of underwriter to use? What kind of contract? If there is no point if you can’t buy that server for your AI, and a penny less won’t serve you, and if you can’t raise the money, you’d rather go back to the drawing board with the equity, then maybe an all or none is what you need. If your idea is so awesome, and already very profitable, you should try to get a broker/dealer to buy every share you need sold.

and the academy award goes to Zehmer!!!

👨‍🏫

Mah mommuh went to dusquenne for lawyer school

You're an actual angel.

*Promosm* 😇

Thank you so much Professor Oranburg. Awesome lectures. We sincerely appreciate it.

May I have access to your other (hidden) lectures?

Thanks a lot!

This is very fascinating especially having a connection to various different religious texts. Ho does the rule of law in relation to jurisprudence play a role in this, such as natural law? You have referenced equity, does this go back to Aristotle?

Great to see more content on this channel! Thanks for creating!

🔥🧅🌋🧅🔥

No reliable at all in my experience.

What is the difference between utmost good faith and good faith

🧑🏼‍🏫

The majority in Groves awarded cost of performance, 60,000. not diminution... also you accidentally said $300 at one point which I'm assuming was a slip up with the market value in Peevey?

This is not good at all. They should do it only in fraud cases not all

i am a 12 year old and i understand every freaking thing you all lol

I'm starting Law School in a few days. Amazing video, very explanatory! Thank you very much!

Man ive been so lost in contracts class. This one video just put it all together and made sense. 🙏

Great video, thank you professor.

Me watching this video as a business Major and thinking.... hmm maybe law isn't bad after all.

Shareholders do not own the corporation. Shareholders are not principals. Shareholders are shareholders who provide capital and have specific rights. The shareholder does not grant authority to directors as the directors sell shares in an IPO. The shareholders can't "appoint" the directors if they don't exist.

Fainess, Acting fairly is not imposing impossible terms such as : "Return the bottom portion of this loan statement with your payment.. by this due date*, but not delivering the loan statement until 90 days past the due date stipulated.

Do you have a link to your flow chart?

It would benefit the general population more to focus on what the available remedies are when a goliath breaches that implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. It's probably often the only cause of action someone can rely upon to attempt to pursue justice.

This 12 minute video was more helpful than my entire semester of “privately owned businesses” class. Thank you.

I'm wondering if you can give an example of a promissory condition? Also, I'm wondering why the condition in Jacob & Young v Kent was not an explicit condition or term? Thank you so much!

SUPERB EXCELLENT .

Heres what my AI said that I trained on my own countries laws: In this scenario, it is likely that the man will prevail if he brings suit against the gardener for breach of contract. The correct answer is (B) The man, because the gardener's part performance necessarily implied an acceptance and a promise that he would render complete performance. Under contract law, a valid contract requires an offer, acceptance, consideration, and mutual intent to be bound. In this case, the man made an offer to the gardener, stating that if the gardener promises to mow his lawn by Saturday, he will pay him N$900. This offer creates the initial terms of the contract. The gardener's actions can be seen as acceptance and part performance of the contract. Despite not explicitly stating his acceptance, the gardener arrived at the man's home on Friday and began mowing the lawn. This conduct can be interpreted as an implied acceptance of the offer and a promise to render complete performance. However, the gardener's performance was incomplete as he only mowed half of the lawn. This constitutes a breach of contract as he did not fulfill his obligation to complete the job by Saturday. The gardener's subsequent note, apologizing for running out of gas and stating that he will finish the job on Monday, can be seen as an attempt to cure the defective performance. While this may be considered an offer to cure, it does not absolve the gardener of his initial breach of contract. Therefore, the man is likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the gardener for breach of contract. The gardener's part performance and subsequent offer to cure do not excuse his failure to complete the job as agreed upon in the original contract.

Why wouldn’t the Americans lives matter more than shareholder dividends? Why has this not been contested? 😢

Awesome video, thank you!

"agape," self-sacrificing love

Hi, in California...what is the name of the bar exams needed to practice Law and practice in a specific field of study? Is it the MPRE and the MBE exam? Or is it the UBE and the MPRE exam...I would really appreciate your reply. Thank you.

Good job

I'm doing my assignment now a days so I'll use this... Thanks

I’ve just been watching Suits too much and wanted to see an example of a question on the Bar exam. Interesting stuff!

Its so crazy to see these videos. This is about my great grandfather. BTW our last name is pronounced ZEE MER

where does this man teach? what uni?

27:00 females are paid more? That’s sеxist and misаndristiс

Normally your lectures are bоring as hеll and I want to sleep, but this one was interesting (lots of examples, comparisons, jokes)

Looking at people in the comment section guessed the right answer with 0 legal analysis and think they have become attorneys* Guys, common sense does not get you to pass the bar, all they have to do is change one word in the question to flip your whole common sense upside down.

I recieved mine today and made a few test recordings. I noticed that the Philips DVT 8010 only plays back a partial recording, when playing from the recording screen. When zi went back into the menu, the full recording was there, howeve it ended the recording approx 2 seconds early. So I counted 2 seconds after I stopped speaking on 1 recording, counted to 10 the was silent for 2 seconds then I pressed stop. This seemed to work. Have a look in the menu, your interview maybe there.

Where a conditional offer is made - is it right that is the condition is "condition precedent", then the contract is void until the condition is met (regardless of whether the offeree has accepted it previously). Also, if the condition is "condition subsequent", then the contract is 'voidable' when the condition fails to be met.

Jew

Never took a law class but I knew it was B

Get the right answer* Me: I'm ready for the BAR

Thank you